Java BlockingQueue take() vs poll()(Java BlockingQueue take() 与 poll())
问题描述
When consuming values from a Queue in an infinite loop -- what would be more efficient:
1) Blocking on the Queue until a value is available via take()
while (value = queue.take()) { doSomething(value); }
2) Sleeping for n milliseconds and checking if an item is available
while (true) {
if ((value = queue.poll()) != null) { doSomething(value); }
Thread.sleep(1000);
}
Blocking is likely more efficient. In the background, the thread that initially calls take()
goes to sleep if there is no element available, letting other threads do whatever they need to do. The methods that add elements to the Queue will then wake up waiting threads when an element is added, so minimal time is spent checking the queue over and over again for whether an element is available.
这篇关于Java BlockingQueue take() 与 poll()的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持编程学习网!
本文标题为:Java BlockingQueue take() 与 poll()


- C++ 和 Java 进程之间的共享内存 2022-01-01
- Safepoint+stats 日志,输出 JDK12 中没有 vmop 操作 2022-01-01
- Spring Boot连接到使用仲裁器运行的MongoDB副本集 2022-01-01
- 将log4j 1.2配置转换为log4j 2配置 2022-01-01
- value & 是什么意思?0xff 在 Java 中做什么? 2022-01-01
- Jersey REST 客户端:发布多部分数据 2022-01-01
- 如何使用WebFilter实现授权头检查 2022-01-01
- 从 finally 块返回时 Java 的奇怪行为 2022-01-01
- Java包名称中单词分隔符的约定是什么? 2022-01-01
- Eclipse 插件更新错误日志在哪里? 2022-01-01