snk vs. code signing certificate(snk 与代码签名证书)
问题描述
In my organization we use snk files with strong names assemblies. We generate the snk ourselves.
In addition we use a code signing signature on the binaries. We get the pfx from Verisign.
- What is the difference between these two processes?
- Isn't it a problem that the snk is not recevied from Verisign also?
The snk and pfx are used for two different purposes. The snk is used for strong-naming, which uses a key pair to uniquely identify an assembly. The pfx is for code signing, which is a similar process but one that is intended to prevent malicious tampering with assemblies that are distributed publicly. Using both on an assembly both strong-names AND signs it.
It's OK to generate your own SNK file as long as you keep the private key secure. The PFX file you get from Verisign allows you to sign the assembly using a key secured by a third party. This is an additional layer of security that lets users of your assembly know that it has not been tampered with.
这篇关于snk 与代码签名证书的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持编程学习网!
本文标题为:snk 与代码签名证书


- 输入按键事件处理程序 2022-01-01
- C#MongoDB使用Builders查找派生对象 2022-09-04
- C# 中多线程网络服务器的模式 2022-01-01
- 良好实践:如何重用 .csproj 和 .sln 文件来为 CI 创建 2022-01-01
- MoreLinq maxBy vs LINQ max + where 2022-01-01
- 如何用自己压缩一个 IEnumerable 2022-01-01
- WebMatrix WebSecurity PasswordSalt 2022-01-01
- 在哪里可以找到使用中的C#/XML文档注释的好例子? 2022-01-01
- 带有服务/守护程序应用程序的 Microsoft Graph CSharp SDK 和 OneDrive for Business - 配额方面返回 null 2022-01-01
- Web Api 中的 Swagger .netcore 3.1,使用 swagger UI 设置日期时间格式 2022-01-01