AutoResetEvent, ManualResetEvent vs Monitor(AutoResetEvent、ManualResetEvent 与监视器)
问题描述
Lets say I have to orchestrate a synchronization algorithm in .Net 3.5 SP1 and any of the synchronization primitives listed in the title fit perfectly for the task.
From a performance perspective, is any single one of those more performant than the others?
I ask this because I have been coding for a while now, but without proper knowledge on the subject.
If you can, go with Monitor. It's similar to a CRITICAL_SECTION. AutoResetEvent/ManualResetEvent might have slightly more overhead, since these can be shared by different processes, whereas a Monitor belongs to a single process.
这篇关于AutoResetEvent、ManualResetEvent 与监视器的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持编程学习网!
本文标题为:AutoResetEvent、ManualResetEvent 与监视器


- 带有服务/守护程序应用程序的 Microsoft Graph CSharp SDK 和 OneDrive for Business - 配额方面返回 null 2022-01-01
- MoreLinq maxBy vs LINQ max + where 2022-01-01
- 如何用自己压缩一个 IEnumerable 2022-01-01
- WebMatrix WebSecurity PasswordSalt 2022-01-01
- C#MongoDB使用Builders查找派生对象 2022-09-04
- 在哪里可以找到使用中的C#/XML文档注释的好例子? 2022-01-01
- C# 中多线程网络服务器的模式 2022-01-01
- Web Api 中的 Swagger .netcore 3.1,使用 swagger UI 设置日期时间格式 2022-01-01
- 输入按键事件处理程序 2022-01-01
- 良好实践:如何重用 .csproj 和 .sln 文件来为 CI 创建 2022-01-01