复制 std::vector:更喜欢赋值还是 std::copy?

Copying std::vector: prefer assignment or std::copy?(复制 std::vector:更喜欢赋值还是 std::copy?)

问题描述

我有两个向量:

std::vector<int> v1, v2;

// Filling v1
...

现在我需要将 v1 复制到 v2.有什么理由更喜欢

And now I need to copy v1 to v2. Is there any reason to prefer

v2 = v1;

到

std::copy (v1.begin(), v1.end(), v2.begin());

(反之亦然)?

推荐答案

一般来说我更喜欢 v2 = v1:

1. 它更短，使意图更清晰
如果 v2 与 v1 的长度不同，
2. std::copy 将不起作用(它不会调整它的大小)，所以它会在最好的情况下保留一些旧元素(v2.size() > v1.size() 并覆盖程序最坏情况下其他地方使用的一些随机数据
3. 如果 v1 即将过期(并且您使用 C++11)，您可以轻松修改它以移动 内容
4. 性能分配不太可能比 std::copy 慢，因为实施者可能会在内部使用 std::copy，如果它能带来性能优势.

1. It is shorter and makes the intent more clear
2. std::copy won't work if v2 doesn't have the same length as v1 (it won't resize it, so it will retain some of the old elements best case (v2.size() > v1.size() and overwrite some random data used elsewhere in the program worst case
3. If v1 is about to expire (and you use C++11) you can easily modify it to move the contents
4. Performancewise assignment is unlikely to be slower then std::copy, since the implementers would probably use std::copy internally, if it gave a performance benefit.

总而言之，std::copy 的表现力较差，可能会做错事，甚至更快.所以真的没有任何理由在这里使用它.

In conclusion, std::copy is less expressive, might do the wrong thing and isn't even faster. So there isn't really any reason to use it here.

这篇关于复制 std::vector:更喜欢赋值还是 std::copy?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持编程学习网！