Is there any reason to check for a NULL pointer before deleting?(是否有任何理由在删除之前检查 NULL 指针?)
问题描述
我经常看到遗留代码在删除指针之前检查NULL
,类似于,
I often see legacy code checking for NULL
before deleting a pointer, similar to,
if (NULL != pSomeObject)
{
delete pSomeObject;
pSomeObject = NULL;
}
是否有任何理由在删除之前检查 NULL
指针?之后将指针设置为NULL
的原因是什么?
Is there any reason to checking for a NULL
pointer before deleting it? What is the reason for setting the pointer to NULL
afterwards?
推荐答案
删除空指针是完全安全"的;它实际上相当于一个空操作.
It's perfectly "safe" to delete a null pointer; it effectively amounts to a no-op.
您可能希望在删除之前检查 null 的原因是尝试删除空指针可能表明您的程序中存在错误.
The reason you might want to check for null before you delete is that trying to delete a null pointer could indicate a bug in your program.
编辑
注意:如果重载删除操作符,删除NULL
NOTE: if you overload the delete operator, it may no longer be "safe" to delete NULL
这篇关于是否有任何理由在删除之前检查 NULL 指针?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持编程学习网!
本文标题为:是否有任何理由在删除之前检查 NULL 指针?
- 一起使用 MPI 和 OpenCV 时出现分段错误 2022-01-01
- C++ 协变模板 2021-01-01
- 使用/clr 时出现 LNK2022 错误 2022-01-01
- 静态初始化顺序失败 2022-01-01
- 与 int by int 相比,为什么执行 float by float 矩阵乘法更快? 2021-01-01
- 从python回调到c++的选项 2022-11-16
- STL 中有 dereference_iterator 吗? 2022-01-01
- 近似搜索的工作原理 2021-01-01
- 如何对自定义类的向量使用std::find()? 2022-11-07
- Stroustrup 的 Simple_window.h 2022-01-01